[CentOS] XFS install issue
Joshua Baker-LePain
jlb17 at duke.edu
Mon Jun 2 16:29:02 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 at 7:03am, Johnny Hughes wrote
> I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. If XFS was
> production ready, it would be in RHEL. Since it is turned on in Fedora and
> since it is purposely turned off in RHEL, one can reasonably conclude that
> the upstream people DO NOT THINK it is stable enough to use in production on
> RHEL. This is JUST my opinion :D
IIRC, RH's stated reason (stated on the mailing lists in the midst of
folks clamoring for XFS' inclusion) for not having XFS turned on in RHEL
is *not* that it's not production ready. It's that they only have the
resources (read: folks with knowledge in-depth enough to satisfy
enterprise customers) to support 1 FS, and that's ext3.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin
UCSF
More information about the CentOS
mailing list