centos at 911networks.com wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 > Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > > CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... > > and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are > > really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5. > > I think that the problem is the naming/numbering convention. If CentOS > would follow the same naming convention as RH, some people would be > less confused. You mean like 5.1, 5.2 and so on? Yeah, that really would be better. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080624/27132ce0/attachment-0005.sig>