centos at 911networks.com wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:41:37 -0500 > Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> CentOS-5.0, CentOS-5.1 and CentOS-5.2 are update sets of CentOS-5 ... >> and are still CentOS-5. The .0, .1, and .2 are update sets and are >> really just a "frozen point in time" of CentOS-5. > > I think that the problem is the naming/numbering convention. If CentOS > would follow the same naming convention as RH, some people would be > less confused. > > For the rest of us: Thanks for the great job > > Actually ... Red Hat changed their numbering system to be like ours ... and if you look at their lastest release announcements you will see 5.1 and 5.2 :D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080624/e3ff4a67/attachment-0005.sig>