On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Matt Shields <mattboston at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > > The usual idea is that because its "Free" Software you can't restrict > > it in anyway... and that the 'Freedom' trumps any other license or > > agreement. And I will bet that if you have enough money, there will be > > lawyers who will come up with ways to argue that is a valid > > interpretation.. and will argue it over and over again as long as you > > have money. > > I find it funny how people love to complain because companies like > RedHat and SuSE/Novell have found a way to make a business out of a > free product. There is nothing forcing you to use their distro. That's fine. But I think no one here has problems with that. I think the discussion is rather how it is played by the rules of the GPL. That's a good and fair question. -- Daniel