On Tuesday 13 May 2008 04:20:46 Doug Tucker wrote: > Tru, > > I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test > environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated > at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded > with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled > against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs > and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that > matter) and be lucky enough it would work? From my experience, if the production server is running OK, and the update is not security-related, then there is NO NEED to update in your situation. If you DO want to update for whatever reason, test it first in a testbed. Trust me. It comes from a traumatic experience :) -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 07:51:43 up 54 min, 2.6.22-14-generic GNU/Linux Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org The real challenge of teaching is getting your students motivated to learn. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080513/bd1d064e/attachment-0004.sig>