Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> Because it would be shooting cannons at birds in this particular case. >> If you need to expose both nodes "to the public" all the time, you >> probably also run the software on both nodes - which would be more of a >> cluster than a failover setup >:) >> > But, a cluster in itself is fail over :) If either node is dead, the > cluster is still up I really wouldn't always count on that >:) Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080519/e5598126/attachment-0005.sig>