[CentOS] RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

Mon May 26 17:20:16 UTC 2008
MHR <mhullrich at gmail.com>

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Linux <linuxlist at gmail.com> wrote:
> [1] http://www.issociate.de/board/post/411069/RAID_10_resync_leading_to_attempt_to_access_beyond_end_of_device.html

At the risk of getting handed my head here, I offer the following:

[1] above refers to a bug in a "custom compiled unpatched 2.6.20
kernel" raid10 driver, which was being used with FC4.  What this has
to do with CentOS 4 or 5 I don't know, since we are not up to the
2.6.20 kernel yet.

"Linux," although this suggestion may be a little late, you might want
to turn down the tone of your postings.  The core developers on the
CentOS team don't usually take well to insults, profanity and so on.
Unless you are a Linux kernel developer or a member of the
aforementioned team, you might read and write with a small, 4 or 5 kg
grain of salt....