[CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
Damian S
dsteward at internode.on.netSat Oct 4 16:25:39 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
- Next message: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To answer my question, I have found the allow_execmem boolean, and set it. So, should I file a bug with someone? Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux and be done with it. Does anyone here run ejabberd with SELinux enabled?
- Previous message: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
- Next message: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list