[CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
nate
centos at linuxpowered.netSat Oct 4 16:43:21 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
- Next message: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Damian S wrote: > To answer my question, I have found the allow_execmem boolean, and set > it. > > So, should I file a bug with someone? > > Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently > interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux > and be done with it. That's what I'd suggest too. SELinux isn't even installed on any of the systems I manage(roughly 350). Not worth the trouble. nate
- Previous message: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
- Next message: [CentOS] ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list