[CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgTue Oct 14 22:13:18 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, I've read on LPI Linux Certification (Ed O'Reilly) in a nutshell > the following thing: > > "parted, unfortunately, has been known to corrupt partition tables and > ruin filesystem." > Sounds like a question for the parted list, not here. Plenty of stuff in CentOS uses parted, and there is nothing you can do about it. And Just to remind everyone that no, this is still not a general conversation about stuff list. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list