[CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
David Mackintosh
David.Mackintosh at xdroop.comWed Oct 15 02:06:45 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:13:18PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > And Just to remind everyone that no, this is still not a general > conversation about stuff list. How off-topic is it to ask precisely what is on-topic for this list if questions and discussions of the included components belong on the support mechanisms for those individual parts, and the rest (ie anaconda and friends) probably belongs in the upstream vendor's forums? What does that leave? The color of the logo? (I like the blue.) -- /\oo/\ / /()\ \ David Mackintosh | dave at xdroop.com | http://www.xdroop.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081014/3c420ede/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Next message: [CentOS] OT: is parted reliable?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list