[CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
David G. Mackay
mackay_d at bellsouth.netSat Oct 25 17:34:48 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 12:16 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 12:14 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > <snip> > > > Circa 1971/2(?), we had an IBM S360/30 with 64K (that's right, "K", "M") > s/"M"/not "M"/ Yep. The first computer I programmed on was an IBM 1130 with 16K of core. You could power down for the weekend, and the memory contents would still be there when you powered up on Monday. Dave
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list