[CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
Nifty Cluster Mitch
niftycluster at niftyegg.comSun Oct 26 00:20:22 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:16:23PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 12:14 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > <snip> > > > Circa 1971/2(?), we had an IBM S360/30 with 64K (that's right, "K", "M") > s/"M"/not "M"/ I wish I still had some of my 789 and 6789 cards. If only to use as bookmarks when I nod off in the middle of the afternoon drooling. -- T o m M i t c h e l l Found me a new hat, now what?
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list