Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:46:14 -0400: > >> I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point out >> the problem, but maybe next time leave some text clue as to whom you are >> referring. > > why? The threading makes it quite clear who I replied to. You're trying to tell someone their threading mechanism is broken by relying on their threading mechanism working? > Or is your client > broken either? What makes you think mine is broken? I could just have the reader set to threaded mode. Which it is. -- tkb