Toby Bluhm wrote: > Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Toby Bluhm wrote on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:46:14 -0400: >> >>> I didn't know who you were talking about either. It's good to point out >>> the problem, but maybe next time leave some text clue as to whom you are >>> referring. >> why? The threading makes it quite clear who I replied to. > > You're trying to tell someone their threading mechanism is broken by > relying on their threading mechanism working? > >> Or is your client >> broken either? > > What makes you think mine is broken? I could just have the reader set to > threaded mode. Which it is. > I thought I screwed that up. I meant to say I *don't* have it set to threaded mode. -- tkb