On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Les Mikesell wrote: > And meanwhile there are things that aren't on schedule. > Or maybe there isn't a schedule - or maybe no one is > supposed to expect one. oh please -- You've been around software, computers, and FOSS long enough to know the game -- Publish a schedule and take a day longer. Not soon enough, why are they so slow, and if a miss, the sky is falling, in commercial world angry stockholder suits, and all the externalities; don't publish a schedule and say: when it is ready, or enforce no un-planned leaks like Apple or RHT: just as much carping, but no miss. People can project their expectations all they wish; I won't feed those >>> We'd feel better if you shared your contingency plans. >> >> I've done that repeatedly -- either people do not read, or >> will not believe what we write. Nothing of human creation >> cannot be all things to all people and it is foolish to think >> otherwise. > > That was in response to Johnny's comment about having to personally know as may be, but the same result obtains for me being frank. > someone before they would be allowed to touch anything in the > repository. What if something happens to Johnny? Is there a bigger > picture? The sub-domain under discussion and mentioned by hughesjr and others is a sub-doamin of centos.org. I believe the group has sketched it out already. Website, front page, top right: The CentOS project is now in control of the CentOS.org ... domain ... but as I said before, people do not read, or will not believe what we write. More details appear when we release more details Who is the fool here? -- Russ herrold