[CentOS] squid HA failover?
nate
centos at linuxpowered.netThu Feb 5 21:57:00 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] squid HA failover?
- Next message: [CentOS] squid HA failover?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Les Mikesell wrote: > I'm running a pair of squids as an internal cache for some intermediate > data used by a web server farm and currently doing failover by going > through an F5 bigip. However, I'd like to avoid the bigip and use > heartbeat since there are only two machines. I don't need to sync any I use bigip even if there is only 1 machine, using heartbeat sounds like it will make it quite a bit more complicated, load balancers make life easier..since you already have a good one(a pair hopefully), keep using it! I use load balancers wherever possible even with 1 machine so I can make changes to the system(s) in the pool without impact. e.g. if I want to replace hardware, I can install the new hardware, add it to the pool and remove the old system. Of course it's ideal to always have at least 2. nate
- Previous message: [CentOS] squid HA failover?
- Next message: [CentOS] squid HA failover?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list