On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dag Wieers <dag at centos.org> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ned Slider wrote: > >> Dag Wieers wrote: >>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers <dag at centos.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit. >>>> And firmware for the iwl* drivers will become available from RPMforge >>>> as soon as Dag has a chance to push them... :-D >>>> >>>> Thanks to Ned for providing them. >>> >>> Yes, they will be available in RPM format by tomorrow. >>> >>> Back to our regular programme... >> >> Thanks Dag - you're a star! > > A dying star ;-) > > Anyway, looking at the SPEC files I noticed for iwl3945 and iwl4956 > firmware not the latest version have been used. Is there a good reason for > it or just an oversight ? Let me explain :-) When I tested the -2 version of the iwl3945 firmware, it did not work for me and I had to go back to the -1. > If there is a reason we should state so in the SPEC file so people retain > that information. > > PS Are you sure you don't want RPMforge commit access ? I'm sure Ned would love to have the access. :D Akemi