On 06/17/2009 09:56 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > "Historical Reasons", probably. All RHSAs should be there, RHBAs just > haven't been announced for 4 - there's no other appalling reason I could > think of at the moment :) with the new process's going in - that should change. > I'm not sure about RHEAs, though. We have done most for C5, not all for C4. The tricky situation is also for the updates when a new iso set is released, eg 5.2 -> 5.3, upstream tend to publish a report for each package that is out there, we havent done that 'traditionally'. Given time and resources, I am sure we can revisit that, if anyone is really interested. - KB