> The tricky situation is also for the updates when a new iso set is > released, eg 5.2 -> 5.3, upstream tend to publish a report for each > package that is out there, we havent done that 'traditionally'. Given > time and resources, I am sure we can revisit that, if anyone is really > interested. > > - KB I believe that's where I am seeing the biggest discrepancy. Has there been any discussion to put the advisory data in an updateinfo.xml form for use with the yum-security plugin?