Joe Pruett wrote: > i got one as well and when i looked in the headers it appears to be > getting generated via a ohio state trying to reinject the message back to > the list. $STRONG_SWEARWORD > Received: from meriadoc.asc.ohio-state.edu (meriadoc.asc.ohio-state.edu [128.146.117.124]) > by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8326B67B45 > for <centos at centos.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:33:39 -0400 (EDT) > Received: from gollum.asc.ohio-state.edu ([128.146.117.98]) by meriadoc.asc.ohio-state.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); > Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:33:36 -0400 > Received: from mail pickup service by gollum.asc.ohio-state.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC; > Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:33:34 -0400 > Received: from exchange.asc.ohio-state.edu ([128.146.117.123]) by meriadoc.asc.ohio-state.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); > Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:18:04 -0400 > Received: from tnc-mta-2.it.ohio-state.edu ([140.254.54.48]) by exchange.asc.ohio-state.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); > Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:41:16 -0400 And this, people, is why you do *NOT* want any MS product to touch your mail. Anyone here from ohio-state.edu who can drop by there and give someone a hefty smack from me? Joe, thank you very much. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090617/8d346f68/attachment-0005.sig>