Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:36:50 +0200: > Anyone here from ohio-state.edu who can drop by there and give someone a > hefty smack from me? It's not only them. I wasn't aware that the headers are included in those messages. Here's the one from yesterday: Received: from exprod5og104.obsmtp.com (exprod5og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.0.178]) by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D02C67981 for <centos at centos.org>; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:43:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from source ([4.79.213.129]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5ob104.postini.com ([64.18.4.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSjeFViwAMh86nSjs2Sws3+olJxTk7VZO at postini.com; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:43:29 PDT Received: from unknown (HELO cinmlef06.e2k.ad.ge.com) ([3.159.213.37]) by Alpmlip09.e2k.ad.ge.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2009 07:43:18 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by cinmlef06.e2k.ad.ge.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:41:50 -0400 Received: from Cinmlip04.e2k.ad.ge.com ([3.159.144.20]) by cinmlef06.e2k.ad.ge.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:34:45 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO psmtp.com) ([64.18.0.76]) by Cinmlip04.e2k.ad.ge.com with SMTP; 16 Jun 2009 04:33:06 -0400 Received: from source ([72.26.200.202]) by exprod5mx217.postini.com ([64.18.4.13]) with SMTP; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:33:05 GMT Received: from mail.centos.org (voxeldev.centos.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1126F7FC; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:31:32 -0400 (EDT) So, in this case it seems to be cinmlef06.e2k.ad.ge.com doing it. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com