I am sorry for the miss understanding, I really agree to that too, but it is just that i thought you could have an alternative like the one I read in the http://www.howtoforge.com which actually just talked about downloading a vanilla kernel and applying your patch and them making an rpm version so you could run on other systems. On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Filipe Brandenburger > <filbranden at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > First of all, please do not top post and trim your replies. > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 14:31, Mfawa Alfred Onen<muffycompoqm at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Filipe Brandenburger < > filbranden at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> This information should be helpful in rebuilding the kernel "the > CentOS way": > > >> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel > > > > > > you could head to http://www.howtoforge.com and find the "Compiling > the > > > Kernel the CentOS way" > > > > Second: for CentOS related subjects, how can one expect something in > > howtoforge (or anywhere else) to be better than content in the CentOS > > Wiki? > > > > Especially in the case of that specific page, which I know is > > regularly kept up to date and will reflect newer versions of the > > kernel shipped with CentOS... > > > > Filipe > > I can only agree with Filipe ... :-D > > Akemi > (Co-maintainer of the kernel wiki articles) > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090617/a02050d3/attachment-0005.html>