thanx. i missed that > >From: Neil Aggarwal <neil at JAMMConsulting.com> >To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:36:37 PM >Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster > > > > >You will still >be limited to a single primary server with DRBD. >Here is a line from >their site: >DRBD's primary-primary >mode with a shared disk file system (GFS, OCFS2). These systems are very >sensitive to failures of the replication network. Currently we cannot generally >recommend this for production use. > >-- >Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, >www.JAMMConsulting.com >100% uptime for your e-commerce site! Stay fully >operational >even with a db server failure. Ask me about the GRed >database. > > > ________________________________ From: centos-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Linux >> Advocate >>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 12:13 AM >>To: CentOS >> mailing list >>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 servers >> cluster >> >> >>thanx bro. yes i have been looking as well. have looked at >> drbd... >> >> >> >> ________________________________ From: Neil Aggarwal >> <neil at JAMMConsulting.com> >>To: CentOS mailing list >> <centos at centos.org> >>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 12:32:46 >> PM >>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 >> servers cluster >> >> >> >>We tried Sequioa: >>http://www.continuent.com/community/lab-projects/sequoia >> >>We wanted automatic failover and geographical >> distribution >>of the database nodes. Sequoia only supports >> master-master >>operation if the database nodes are on the same >> subnet. >> >>We did not find anything else out there, so we wrote >> our >>own geographically distributed database system. >>We can adapt that to your project if you are >> interested. >> >> >> Neil >> >>-- >>Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com >>Your e-commerce site can be >> geographically redundant and available >>even if failure occurs. Ask me about >> the GRed database system. >> >> >> ________________________________ From: centos-bounces at centos.org >>> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Linux >>> Advocate >>>Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 11:18 PM >>>To: CentOS >>> mailing list >>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 servers >>> cluster >>> >>> >>>taling abt piranha... i understand that its LVS + webfrontend and is >>> suitable fro webpages and so on. What do we need to make it as a LAMP >>> cluster, i.e with a mysql HA backend as well. >>> >>>So-> HA of [ >>> LoadBalancer + Apache + MySQL} >>> >>>Any ideas guys? >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ From: fmb fmb >>> <feedmb at googlemail.com> >>>To: CentOS mailing list >>> <centos at centos.org> >>>Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 11:14:33 >>> PM >>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 >>> servers cluster >>> >>>Thnx Brian. This is the first thing that I >>> will do... >>> >>> >>>On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Brian Mathis <brian.mathis at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>CentOS has the redhat piranha packages available for >>>> install. Piranha >>>>is a repackaging of the linux virtual server >>>> software, along with a >>>>web-based front-end. You can find >>>> information about that in the >>>>CentOS docs and also by googling for >>>> "redhat piranha". >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:57 PM, fmb fmb<feedmb at googlemail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I am thinking of setting up two servers >>>> in load balance mode. I would really >>>>> appreciate your suggestions >>>> and hints... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> thnx, >>>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>CentOS >>>> mailing list >>>>CentOS at centos.org >>>>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>>> >>> >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090629/3680b7fa/attachment-0005.html>