mbneto wrote: > Hi, > > > There were some unusual situations with core developers this time > around. > > > This is something that we should address don't you think? Well, Karanbir has already weighed in on the thread. If he needs help I'm sure he knows where to ask. > Some additional resources could help but since CentOS developers are > unpaid, raising money for human resources may not be the correct > approach. Beefing up the buildsystem has been noted as something > desirable. > > > I think that this is somewhat contradictory. If the developers are > unpaid we should be considering at least some help (paid one) so we can > expect a more regular approach not a best effort one. Hiring and managing employees has substantial overhead involved. I doubt this is worthwhile. > > And who is going to develop such nice automation? There has been > regular news: > > <http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=18223&forum=37> > > > Well, there is no need to automation. This paid help would send one > email per day with the summary. If you need faster updates or more support than CentOS can provide, please consider RHEL as an option. CentOS would not exist without them.