[CentOS] IBM ServeRAID Manager software

Timo Schoeler timo.schoeler at riscworks.net
Sat May 30 07:28:03 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

thus Drew spake:
>>> To make it short: Have a x345 here with ServeRAID ?? (Adaptec
>>> ASR-2020S). As soon as I realized I have to install additional SW and
>>> the HBA has no decent BIOS, I ripped it out of the machine and went mdadm.
>> The x345 seems to be a bad example, the speed on the ServeRaid adapter
>> in there really sucked, I am seeing better throughput with mdadm on
>> there too.
>>
>> With other machines I really didn't have problems with ServeRaid, except
>> if you suddenly get one of those ServeRaid cards which can only do
>> RAID1 or RAID0 :)
> 
> The 7k model on this one does RAID 5 and the two non-standard 5E & 5EE
> versions. The performance on the contoller is not bad given that the
> RAID is hung off either the PCI-X133 or PCI-E busses (forget which).
> Both CentOS & Win2k03 performance is adequate.

Mine stuck in the PCI-X133 (the x345 doesn't have PCIe). It should be
able to provide decent performance. However, even given that decent
software for management is provided, I like to go the ``it's already
supported out of the box by the OS installed'' approch (I must confess
that I really like OpenBSD in this regard)...

> As an aside, I'm still running tests on Samba 3 as a AD domain member
> and aside from having to chmod 777 the root of the fileshare to allow
> the ACL's to work properly everything is fine. But that's an issue for
> another list.

Best,

Timo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFKIOADO/2mgkVVV7kRAmgoAJ98mA+rlZ1zc7qxpZVZ56yrXQvjJACeKogr
jxHXpq6r2A1QFGWycw61tU4=
=c2mo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the CentOS mailing list