[CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
centos at linuxpowered.net
Fri Oct 30 03:32:30 UTC 2009
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> I don't think umask is involved here. As far as I know umask isn't
> when dealing with default ACL's. Anyhow, I'm pretty sure this is by design
> (security-wise). Is there any way to override this behaviour?
It's been eons since I played with acls, but I thought you can
only view acls via getfacl(or other similar commands) ls -l doesn't
do anything to show acls, only unix-style permissions.
More information about the CentOS