[CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
nate
centos at linuxpowered.netFri Oct 30 02:32:30 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
- Next message: [CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jorge Fábregas wrote: > I don't think umask is involved here. As far as I know umask isn't > involved > when dealing with default ACL's. Anyhow, I'm pretty sure this is by design > (security-wise). Is there any way to override this behaviour? It's been eons since I played with acls, but I thought you can only view acls via getfacl(or other similar commands) ls -l doesn't do anything to show acls, only unix-style permissions. nate
- Previous message: [CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
- Next message: [CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list