[CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
Jorge Fábregas
jorge.fabregas at gmail.comFri Oct 30 11:13:41 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
- Next message: [CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday 29 October 2009 10:32:30 pm nate wrote: > It's been eons since I played with acls, but I thought you can > only view acls via getfacl(or other similar commands) ls -l doesn't > do anything to show acls, only unix-style permissions. Hello nate, Yes, I use getfacl to see the ACLs but in this case I used a "default ACL" that sets "regular permissions" on new files and thus any new file won't have actually an ACL. In my case, the new file looks like: -rw------- 1 joe joe 0 Oct 29 21:14 testFile.txt If It had any ACL on it... a plus sign would appear at the end of the permission bits, like this: -rw-------+ 1 joe joe 0 Oct 29 21:14 testFile.txt Best regards, Jorge
- Previous message: [CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
- Next message: [CentOS] Default ACL question (EXECUTE BIT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list