[CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS

Sorin Srbu sorin.srbu at orgfarm.uu.se
Thu Feb 25 13:12:20 UTC 2010

>-----Original Message-----
>From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
>Of Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:50 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
>3.1.0-5 from one repo is not necessarily better
>than 3.1.0-1 from another: it's the same upstream code, the -5 is only
>useful for comparing within a given repo.

I had no idea...! 

Is this a general thing with most (all?) repos?

Thanks for the info!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5110 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100225/25b566c2/attachment.bin 

More information about the CentOS mailing list