On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:32:23PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > 2010/2/17 <m.roth at 5-cent.us>: > >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:51 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Could be $%^&* flash. That was happening about 4 mos. ago. > >>>> > >>> Mark, can you be a bit more specific, please? > >>> > >>> What / which flash are you referring to exactly? > >> > >> Flashplayer. nsplugin<whatsit> There was even (finally) a bug reported > >> for > >> it, a few months back, and it took them a week to find an unnoted > >> dependency, and not only would firefox crash, but their crashreporter > >> would crash, because *it* was dependent upon the missing package. > > > > nspluginwrapper? 32bit flash on 64bit env? why you just don't run the > > 64bit flash? > > You mean the version that didn't exist, and is just now mentioned on > slashdot as ->ALPHA<- software? > Wasn't the link from that slashdot article pointing to a news item from 2008? iirc 64bit flash for linux has been there for 1,5 years or so. -- Pasi