> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:32:23PM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> > 2010/2/17 <m.roth at 5-cent.us>: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:51 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: <snip> >> > nspluginwrapper? 32bit flash on 64bit env? why you just don't run the >> > 64bit flash? >> >> You mean the version that didn't exist, and is just now mentioned on >> slashdot as ->ALPHA<- software? > > Wasn't the link from that slashdot article pointing to a news item from > 2008? > > iirc 64bit flash for linux has been there for 1,5 years or so. I didn't follow the link. However, if that's so, then I would have expected it to be included when I did a fresh install of CentOS 5.4 x86_64. <shrug> mark "flash, why did it have to be flash?"* * And why on *Earth* would any idiot HR person+ have a flash video on the page you're trying to search jobs for their company, which I saw last year...? + But I repeat myself