[CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Jan 11 18:33:52 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Next message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/11/2010 11:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> It seems X4500 (not available anymore) had Marvell SATA controllers, that >> are not supported with RHEL5. >> > > And those marvell controllers caused major grief for Sun, especially > when Solaris added support for NCQ somewhere in there. under heavy IO > workloads, the controllers would just hang. Some nasty bugs. Driver > software workarounds caused a big performance hit. Is that a different chipset than http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815121009 uses? I replaced a Paradise and Adaptec card with one of these (or maybe the PCI-E version) and Centos recognized it and worked better than with the two different cards. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Next message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list