[CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
William Warren
hescominsoon at emmanuelcomputerconsulting.comMon Jan 11 19:19:14 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Next message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/11/2010 1:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 1/11/2010 11:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> >>> It seems X4500 (not available anymore) had Marvell SATA controllers, that >>> are not supported with RHEL5. >>> >>> >> And those marvell controllers caused major grief for Sun, especially >> when Solaris added support for NCQ somewhere in there. under heavy IO >> workloads, the controllers would just hang. Some nasty bugs. Driver >> software workarounds caused a big performance hit. >> > Is that a different chipset than > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815121009 uses? I > replaced a Paradise and Adaptec card with one of these (or maybe the > PCI-E version) and Centos recognized it and worked better than with the > two different cards. > > http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Hardware/sata.html#marvell it's fakeraid. I don't know if it's a different one than what was in there previously though..:)
- Previous message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Next message: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list