[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Jan 28 22:44:58 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/28/2010 4:30 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > ok, forget about rsync. forget about which backup script is better, and > which isn't. forget about how I get the data onto the order server. I > don't care about backups, or rsync, or backuppc or bacula or amanda, or > R1soft > > let's keep the question simple. WHICH filesystem would be best for this > type of operation? SMB, NFS, or iSCSI? All are fine locally, horrible over network connections with high latency or limited bandwidth. iSCSI is probably harder to manage if you ever want to see the data from more than one connection. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list