[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comThu Jan 28 23:00:15 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rudi Ahlers wrote: > let's keep the question simple. WHICH filesystem would be best for > this type of operation? SMB, NFS, or iSCSI? ISCSI is not a file system, its purely a block device. works best over fast low latency dedicated links. I think NFS would be better for unix to unix than SMB. SMB/CIFS is better for MS Windows, but neither works very well over high latency connections.
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list