[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
Geoff Galitz
geoff at galitz.orgFri Jan 29 10:12:13 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> The CIFS mounts can't be unmounted without a reboot, > so they build-up a pool of mounts to the same server which cause extra latency Is there an environmental restriction in your application or organization for this? Normally CIFS mounts can umounted easily in runtime. At any rate... if I were in your shoes and really restricted to the options you propose, I would go with CIFS mounts through IPSEC tunnels. -geoff --------------------------------- Geoff Galitz Blankenheim NRW, Germany <http://www.galitz.org/> http://www.galitz.org/ <http://german-way.com/blog/> http://german-way.com/blog/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100129/88743597/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list