[CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Jan 29 20:23:43 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/29/2010 1:37 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > Backing up behind the firewall is made easy by using an SSH tunnel :) > > We already have an offsite backup facility with a 3rd party, but I need > more control over the backups, and want to setup an inhouse backup > server which where all the client's account (this is hosting accounts & > VPS's) be backed up to, then this server will do an rsync with all the > data to the offsite backup server. Can't this be at the same location as the source of the data to eliminate the latency issue? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next message: [CentOS] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list