David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > > On Mon, July 19, 2010 09:09, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Jay Leafey wrote: > >>> As far as the security of my home network goes, I get a giggle every >>> time I scan for wireless networks at home. Mine is the ONLY network >>> that I can reach that is encrypted. >> >> Please - I've enabled WPA, whatever I can, on my ladyfriend's FIOS, and >> my own DSL, and push everyone else. It boggles my mind when I look for >> wireless networks in a residential neighborhood, and see so many that >> are just *open*. > > On the other hand, Bruce Schneier does not really agree with you > <http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/01/my_open_wireles.html>. Yeah, well, I'll talk to Bruce, next time he shows up at a con I'm at. I've *had* my IP blocked, and that was by, what, DNSORBS, or what was his name's thing, and what got blocked was the range of my ISP's range for the city. I also *do* worry about someone I know sending out crap having forged my email address, so, yeah, there's a lot of small-time nastiness out there, and so I *do* secure it as best I can. I ought to email him, and see if he still feels that way. > > There are two issues I see with wireless network security. <snip> > It's certainly very handy to have access to wireless when I visit friends, > go to parties, and so forth. I have an unsecured network of my own at > home that I turn on for parties (fairly small bandwidth). Right. If I trust someone to come over who wants to use a laptop/netbook, I trust 'em enough to hand them the WPA key. I *don't* trust a wardriver at all. mark