On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Paul Graydon <paulgraydon at gmail.com> wrote: > > I've never found it particularly necessary to tune exim, out of the box > with a basic configuration it handles itself very well and scales nicely > even up to heavy loads. I've used it in 100k+ e-mails a day > environments without any stability or performance problems. It's a > rather popular mail server in the UK, possibly by nature of it's origins > at Cambridge. > > I've not spent much time using postfix, but every time I have it's been > relatively straightforward and intuitive as well. Always seems to > perform well too :) > > I rather feel its a bit of a case of 6 of one, half a dozen of the > other. Both tackle the same problem from slightly different angles, and > both have achieved excellence in their own ways. > > There is a great introduction to configuring exim on this site: > http://www.exim-new-users.co.uk > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > > Thanx guys, this is as much as I thought :) There's no real benefit in choosing one over the other, but rather use what I know. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100309/d697f75b/attachment-0004.html>