On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Milos Blazevic <milos.blazevic at sbb.rs> wrote: > Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years. > Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about > to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses > the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I mean, can you imagine > anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a year ago? :) We have some RHEL2 systems still in production. > Anyway, it's nice to see so many people have dumped Fedora for pretty > much the same reason as I have, more than a year ago in favour of > CentOS. And this was after almost two years of discontent with Fedora. Fedora works fine for my play laptop. I have it setup so that critical data is backed up to my fileserver so even if I lose the drive rebuilding just takes 20 minutes or so and I'm back where I left off. I don't use it on any infrastructure stuff at my house, but it's definitely easier to get things like networking, eye candy demo window managers, graphics software, etc.. going under Fedora.