On 3/31/2010 4:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
>
> Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
> Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
> to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
> the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I mean, can you imagine
> anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a year ago?
When something works right there's not much need to change it. I still
have an RH 7.3 box running that's had a couple of 4-year uptime spans
(had to move it once). And several Centos 3.x's.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com