[CentOS] sendmail substitute?
Giles Coochey
giles at coochey.netThu Oct 14 09:32:55 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
- Next message: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> What could be so insecure about using sendmail localy? > Don't start the daemon, so it is not listening... > Or the firewall will block the port anyway... > If the mail is sent to a trusted mail server, there is no risks. > Am I missing something? > On a hardened, production, well configured server that strategy would simply be a part of a "Defence-in-Depth" security strategy. What's the worst that could happen?
- Previous message: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
- Next message: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list