[CentOS] sendmail substitute?
Morten P.D. Stevens
mstevens at imt-systems.comThu Oct 14 17:55:09 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
- Next message: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > > What is the rationale behind deactivating Sendmail. Just curious. Or is it > the typical rant "Sendmail is insecure, see its history"? I don't understand why many people calling sendmail insecure. Sendmail is the default MTA in RHEL, Solaris, AIX, FreeBSD, OpenBSD ... Why should they use an insecure MTA? Sendmail is a very robust and reliable MTA. Best regards, Morten
- Previous message: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
- Next message: [CentOS] sendmail substitute?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list