On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 14:21 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/19/2010 02:09 PM, Jerry Franz wrote: > > That is what it does. It *licenses* distribution between people. You > > can't say "it's under GPL - but you can't redistribute it because I've > > Ok, so that is the point I am trying to make here. RHEL6 isnt released > as a product. They have an in-development code snapshot that they are > offering to a bunch of people to come look at with them for comments, > feedback, prep whathever. > > Also worth keeping in mind is that the RC to partners does not prevent > one of those partners from publishing the sources if they want for code > where licensing and their agreement with Red Hat permits them to. I am > not in a position to comment on that since I have neither seen the > agreement that Red Hat have in place for these said partners, nor am I > one of them. http://www.redhat.com/partners/ John