[CentOS] Ac1dB1tch3z Vs Linux Kernel x86_64 0day
Gerhard Schneider
gs at ilsb.tuwien.ac.atSat Sep 18 19:11:16 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] Maximum IP ranges
- Next message: [CentOS] Ac1dB1tch3z Vs Linux Kernel x86_64 0day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Are there any 64bit CentOS5 kernels available that are immune against the exploit mentioned in the subject? Turning off 32bit support is no option to me.. Gerhard Schneider P.S.: Source code can be found at http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Sep/268 and is working "well" on 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5.centos.plus -- Gerhard Schneider Institute of Lightweight Design and e-Mail: gs at ilsb.tuwien.ac.at Structural Biomechanics (E317) Tel.: +43 664 60 588 3171 Vienna University of Technology / Austria Fax: +43 1 58801 31799 A-1040 Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29 http://www.ilsb.tuwien.ac.at/~gs/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100918/41e3fd92/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Maximum IP ranges
- Next message: [CentOS] Ac1dB1tch3z Vs Linux Kernel x86_64 0day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list