[CentOS] Ac1dB1tch3z Vs Linux Kernel x86_64 0day
Ned Slider
ned at unixmail.co.ukSat Sep 18 20:03:56 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS] Ac1dB1tch3z Vs Linux Kernel x86_64 0day
- Next message: [CentOS] Ac1dB1tch3z Vs Linux Kernel x86_64 0day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 18/09/10 20:11, Gerhard Schneider wrote: > > Are there any 64bit CentOS5 kernels available that are immune against > the exploit mentioned in the subject? Turning off 32bit support is no > option to me.. > > Gerhard Schneider > > P.S.: Source code can be found at > http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Sep/268 and is working "well" on > 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5.centos.plus > > Not at present AFAIK. Red Hat are currently working on backporting a fix. You can track progress here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634457 https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-40265 Given CentOS tracks what Red Hat releases, there's not much CentOS can do until Red Hat release a fix and Red Hat are unlikely to rush a fix out of the door before it's been thoroughly tested.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Ac1dB1tch3z Vs Linux Kernel x86_64 0day
- Next message: [CentOS] Ac1dB1tch3z Vs Linux Kernel x86_64 0day
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list