This is excellent information Akemi, provides opportunities for folks to dig in and specific information that is needed and where to go to learn more...Thanks! :) On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > Changing the subject line for good ... > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote: > >> AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. Starting > >> 6.0 RH releases patched source. This makes backing out a patch, or > >> backporting patches from future development in Fedora (e.g.) far more > >> nightmarish than before. > > > > This one doesn't impact the CentOS core rebuild. It would/could impact > CentOSPlus. > > Yes, it _could_ affect the centosplus kernel. This point was addressed > early on when RHEL-6 was released back in Nov 2010. See: > > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4586 > > Point 2 (note 12051) is the one that is relevant. I welcome any > feedback / suggestions for the proposed method I outlined there. > While you are there, look also at the issues described for Point 3 > (note 12052). Anyone can help in there as well. :) > > So far, "luckily" centosplus kernels are "ahead of" the distro kernel > in that they have been built and are available for testing (see note > 12502). > > Akemi > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110407/cf6cfe21/attachment-0005.html>