centos-bounces at centos.org wrote: > On 4/11/2011 10:55 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> centos-bounces at centos.org wrote: >> >>> The main support *I* need is timely updates and releases. >> >> This is the key indicator that says you want RHEL not CentOS. > > That's only true if you think the CentOS team is incapable of matching > some definition of 'timely'. Proved to be so, with great pain for some. To take a relativistic approach, entities (people or corporations) who are uncomfortable with CentOS's notion of "timely" will be less so with RH's notion of "timely", since RHEL defines the product for which we're waiting. RH is the Time(0) of the process. Speed costs money, time costs money and/or patience. You must either shell out the money for RHEL, or you must shell out time for CentOS. Insert spiffy .sig here: Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts. //me ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**