centos-bounces at centos.org wrote: > /putting on asbestos pants. Not needed... And they itch. > Perhaps the tack to take is to apply pressure to the upstream provider > to release the build details? I am sure that many folks who start with > CentOS, grow to be large and move to RH proper. So there is, I would > venture, an argument to be made that RH providing this info to CentOS > and helping CentOS thrive would be beneficial for their business. I should think to agree; if the CentOS folks are under a non-disclosure to "any entity selling support other than RH", I don't see how this is anything but in RH's best interests. Insert spiffy .sig here: Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts. //me ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**